Showing posts with label news. Show all posts
Showing posts with label news. Show all posts

CPO futures likely to hover below RM3,020

>> Saturday, December 17, 2011


Below is an article copy from Business Times.

Crude palm oil (CPO) futures on Bursa Malaysia Derivatives are expected to remain at RM3,020 level next week in light of the global economic uncertainties, dealers said.

"The price range is expected to hover below RM3,020," a dealer said.

However, the current monsoon season in top palm oil-producing countries in Southeast Asia is expected to offer some support. with expectations of declining output.

On a weekly basis, December 2011 closed RM61 lower at RM2,989 a tonne, January 2012 lost RM98 to RM2,985 a tonne, February 2012 fell RM100 to RM2,984 a tonne while March 2012 slipped RM102 to RM2,984 a tonne.

Turnover for the week was higher at 101,370 lots compared with 97,848 lots last week, while the open position tumbled to 116,782 contracts from 118,592. -- Bernama

Read more...

7 Common Investor Mistakes

>> Saturday, August 6, 2011

Of the mistakes made by investors, seven of them are repeat offenses. In fact, investors have been making these same mistakes since the dawn of modern markets, and will likely be repeating them for years to come. You can significantly boost your chances of investment success by becoming aware of these typical errors and taking steps to avoid them.


1. No PlanAs the old saying goes, if you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there. Solution?

Have a personal investment plan or policy that addresses the following:
  • Goals and objectives - Find out what you're trying to accomplish. Accumulating $100,000 for a child's college education or $2 million for retirement at age 60 are appropriate goals. Beating the market is not a goal.
  • Risks - What risks are relevant to you or your portfolio? If you are a 30-year-old saving for retirement, volatility isn't (or shouldn't be) a meaningful risk. On the other hand, inflation - which erodes any long-term portfolio - is a significant risk. (To see more on risk, read Determining Risk And The Risk Pyramid and Personalizing Risk Tolerance.)
  • Appropriate benchmarks - How will you measure the success of your portfolio, its asset classes and individual funds or managers? (Keep reading about benchmarks in Benchmark Your Returns With Indexes.)
  • Asset allocation - What percentage of your total portfolio will you allocate to U.S. equities, international stocks, U.S. bonds, high-yield bonds, etc. Your asset allocation should accomplish your goals while addressing relevant risks.
  • Diversification - Allocating to different asset classes is the initial layer of diversification. You then need to diversify within each asset class. In U.S. stocks, for example, this means exposure to large-, mid- and small-cap stocks. (Find out more about allocation and diversification in Five Things To Know About Asset Allocation, Choose Your Own Asset Allocation Adventure and A Guide To Portfolio Construction.)
Your written plan's guidelines will help you adhere to a sound long-term policy, even when current market conditions are unsettling. Having a good plan and sticking to it is not nearly as exciting or as much fun as trying to time the markets, but it will likely be more profitable in the long term.

2. Too Short of a Time Horizon
If you are saving for retirement 30 years hence, what the stock market does this year or next shouldn't be the biggest concern. Even if you are just entering retirement at age 70, your life expectancy is likely 15 to 20 years. If you expect to leave some assets to your heirs, then your time horizon is even longer. Of course, if you are saving for your daughter's college education and she's a junior in high school, then your time horizon is appropriately short and your asset allocation should reflect that fact. Most investors are too focused on the short term.

3. Too Much Attention Given to Financial MediaThere is almost nothing on financial news shows that can help you achieve your goals. Turn them off. There are few newsletters that can provide you with anything of value. Even if there were, how do you identify them in advance?

Think about it - if anyone really had profitable stock tips, trading advice or a secret formula to make big bucks, would they blab it on TV or sell it to you for $49 per month? No - they'd keep their mouth shut, make their millions and not have to sell a newsletter to make a living. (To learn more, see Mad Money ... Mad Market? and The Madness Of Crowds.)

Solution? Spend less time watching financial shows on TV and reading newsletters. Spend more time creating - and sticking to - your investment plan.

4. Not Rebalancing Rebalancing is the process of returning your portfolio to its target asset allocation as outlined in your investment plan. Rebalancing is difficult because it forces you to sell the asset class that is performing well and buy more of your worst performing asset classes. This contrarian action is very difficult for many investors.

In addition, rebalancing is unprofitable right up to that point where it pays off spectacularly (think U.S. equities in the late 1990s), and the underperforming assets start to take off. (Keep reading about this subject in Equity Premiums: Looking Back And Looking Ahead.)

However, a portfolio allowed to drift with market returns guarantees that asset classes will be overweighted at market peaks and underweighted at market lows - a formula for poor performance. The solution? Rebalance religiously and reap the long-term rewards. (Find out how to put this tip to use in Rebalance Your Portfolio To Stay On Track, When Fear And Greed Take Over and Master Your Trading Mindtraps.)

5. Overconfidence in the Ability of ManagersFrom numerous studies, including Burton Malkiel's 1995 study entitled, "Returns From Investing In Equity Mutual Funds", we know that most managers will underperform their benchmarks. We also know that there's no consistent way to select - in advance - those managers that will outperform. We also know that very, very few individuals can profitably time the market over the long term. So why are so many investors confident of their abilities to time the market and select outperforming managers?

Fidelity guru Peter Lynch once observed, "There are no market timers in the 'Forbes' 400'." Investors' misplaced overconfidence in their ability to market-time and select outperforming managers leads directly to our next common investment mistake. (For more insight, see Pick Stocks Like Peter Lynch.)

6. Not Enough Indexing
There is not enough time to recite many of the studies that prove that most managers and mutual funds underperform their benchmarks. Over the long-term, low-cost index funds are typically upper second-quartile performers, or better than 65-75% of actively managed funds.

Despite all the evidence in favor of indexing, the desire to invest with active managers remains strong. John Bogle, the founder of Vanguard, says it's because, "Hope springs eternal. Indexing is sort of dull. It flies in the face of the American way [that] 'I can do better.'"
Index all or a large portion (70-80%) of all your traditional asset classes. If you can't resist the excitement of pursuing the next great performer, set aside a portion (20-30%) of each asset class to allocate to active managers. This may satisfy your desire to pursue outperformance without devastating your portfolio.

7. Chasing PerformanceMany investors select asset classes, strategies, managers and funds based on recent strong performance. The feeling that "I'm missing out on great returns" has probably led to more bad investment decisions than any other single factor. If a particular asset class, strategy or fund has done extremely well for three or four years, we know one thing with certainty: We should have invested three or four years ago. Now, however, the particular cycle that led to this great performance may be nearing its end. The smart money is moving out, and the dumb money is pouring in. Stick with your investment plan and rebalance, which is the polar opposite of chasing performance.

Conclusion
Investors who recognize and avoid these seven common mistakes give themselves a great advantage in meeting their investment goals. Most of the solutions above are not exciting, and they don't make great cocktail party conversation. However, they are likely to be profitable. And isn't that why we really invest?

by Jay Yoder, CFA®
Jay A. Yoder, CFA is an accomplished investor and author. He spent 10 years directing the endowments of Smith and Vassar Colleges, generating top-quartile returns for most of his tenure. He subsequently left to co-found an asset management firm which today has $280 million under management. Earlier in his career, he spent seven years with an investment consulting firm.


Read more...

Warren Buffet Watch

>> Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Warren Buffet appeared live in CNBC on March 2,2011. I manage to download a copy transcript of his interview. Its a 60 pages long pdf file, attached below with my highlight.

CNBC Warren Buffet Interview
To make it easy to review, i list down the majors :

Some of Warren Buffet's associate company : Coca-Cola,Wells Fargo, Wrigley,See's Candy,Iscar,Wal-Mart,BNSF Railway,GEICO,Johns Manville,Dairy Queen,Flight Safety,American Express,Fruit of the Loom,Marmon,Netjets,MarquisJet,
  • He is not worry about the oil prices issue regarding what's happening in Libya. It isn't a real supply situation yet, but market anticipate.
  • TTI, a world class leader in quality consumer, professional and industrial products is booming in Asia. I think its a Hong Kong company. Its main product including power tools and accessories, outdoor products, and floor care.
  • The demand for housing comes from household formation. For example, if we build 2 million houses and they were no 2 million families created, it will be a excess supply. The only way to solve that is to underproduce compared to household formations.
  • Warren do not like bonds. He think its a terrible mistake to buy into fixed dollar investments at this kind of rates.
  • While commodities price are going up and up everyday, Warren just don't like them. He like income producing assets.
  • Investment is about you buy the asset now and the asset itself deliver more money over time. For example, Coca-Cola, Wells Fargo and McDonalds.
  • The problem with commodities is you are buying something and hope somebody else will pay you more for the item. The item itself is not doing you anything. Its speculation.
  • An example about gold. If you took all the gold in the world, it makes a cube 67 feet and worth about $7 trillion. Its roughly 1/3 of the value of all stocks in US. Do you prefer to have 1/3 of all the stocks in US or owning that block of gold, which can't do anything.
Warren Buffet :" I like business or i like my earning power as the best assets in a time of inflation. They really can't be taken away"
  • A fair price to buy a company is one that we think we're going to get our money worth in terms of future earnings.
  • US Dollar will become less important over time because America's dominance of world economic system will diminish.
  • Importance of liquidity and not getting overleveraged.
  • People want to be entertained and want to be informed. The demand for media is huge, is worldwide, its going to go on forever. 
I don't have to be right about everything or even understand about everything. I just have to right on the decisions i make. So i stay with the simple things. If i don't see any easy decision, i don't play
  •  A century or so ago, nobody ever heard of monetary policy or fiscal policy. We had recession, it will cured themselves. Millions of American were trying to figure out how to do things better next day. Warren don't like fiscal policy to stimulate the economy.
Inflation is the ultimate Tax. It taxes people who don't know they're being taxed. It taxes people who believe in paper money. Paper money generally has a lousy future.
  • Productivity has improved very significantly. If productivity hadn't improved, we'd have less unemployment right now. But, productivity is great over time. More output is what really solves problems over time. When we have more output per capita, then we'll fight for it.

Read more...

Warren Buffett says on the hunt for deals

>> Monday, February 28, 2011

Warren Buffett says on the hunt for deals

NEW YORK: Warren Buffett is looking for acquisitions as an outlet to deploy his $38 billion cash pile, the legendary investor said in his annual letter to Berkshire Hathaway Inc shareholders on Saturday, Feb 26.
Buffett also gave an aggressive earnings forecast for Berkshire's collection of businesses, said the company would engage in record capital spending and forecast a recovery in the housing market would start within a year.

Buffett acknowledged the need for Berkshire to expand to grow earnings at its non-insurance businesses, a broad collection that most prominently includes the railroad Burlington Northern and the electric utility MidAmerican.

"Our elephant gun has been reloaded, and my trigger finger is itchy," Buffett said. The letter was released just before 8 a.m. EST (1300 GMT on) Saturday, as it is in most years -- and many large investors say they get up early that day to read it the moment it comes online.

The so-called "Oracle of Omaha" said Berkshire will need "more major acquisitions" -- with an italicized emphasis on major -- to meet its goal.

One long-time Berkshire investor described the letter as "punchy" and "confidently American," among other things.

"I would say as an investor, I think it's a very upbeat letter, it's one that celebrates his courage on behalf of investors of going into the marketplace when the world was most fearful," said Tom Russo, a partner at Gardner Russo & Gardner in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, who is one of the 15 largest holders of Berkshire Class A shares.


SUCCESSION
Buffett also addressed the hot-button succession issue in the 26-page letter, something investors had anticipated given his age, 80, and the lack of a clear replacement.

Investment manager Todd Combs, hired late last year, will manage an initial portfolio of $1 billion to $3 billion, Buffett said, and Berkshire may add another one or two managers over time alongside him.

But Buffett said he will continue to manage the bulk of the portfolio while he is CEO. Berkshire's equity holdings topped $52 billion at year-end.

He said less in the letter about who might follow him as chief executive of the company, though he said there were a number of good candidates. The most frequently tipped is David Sokol, chairman of MidAmerican and private jet service NetJets, who Buffett praised in the letter.

THE ECONOMY
Buffett tends to give an economic outlook in his letter and this year's was no exception.

"A housing recovery will probably begin within a year or so," he noted, which has led Berkshire to ramp up spending and acquisitions at its housing-related businesses.

He was less bullish on interest rates, which have been low enough to earn the company a "pittance" on its cash in recent times. Buffett said rates will eventually rise enough to contribute more normal growth to the company's investment income, but it was "unlikely to come soon."

Another hit to the investment portfolio will come from the *redemption of crisis-era preferred investments in Goldman Sachs and General Electric. Buffett said that both are likely to be gone by year-end. The Goldman investment in particular famously pays Berkshire $15 every second.

All things being equal, Buffett forecast Berkshire's "normal" earnings power at about $12 billion a year after-tax.

In the meantime, Buffett is spending on growth. He said Berkshire would make a record $8 billion in capital spending this year, with the $2 billion growth over last year to be spent entirely in the United States.
"Berkshire has created within itself its own outlet to redeploy capital," Russo said. "The best thing about that is when you can by that spending create additional competitive advantage." - Reuters


* redemption of crisis-era preferred investments in Goldman Sachs and General Electric ->see this, Buffet does trade too. Remember that during 2008 recession, he bail out these company and is going to cash out now. I think he think both Goldman and GE are fully value already.

Read more...

Will JCorp sell KFC?

>> Saturday, December 4, 2010

An article about bidding to buy QSR, a majority shareholder of KFC.
  

Saturday December 4, 2010

Will Johor Corp sell KFC?

By RISEN JAYASEELAN
risen@thestar.com.my

IT'S not just finger-licking fried chicken that KFC Holdings (M) Bhd serves up in Malaysia. You can always count on it for a good corporate story. Every now and then, some parties will start fighting for control over it, or more accurately, for the free cash flows the retailer churns out.

In that sense, nothing's new this time around. A number of parties have made competing bids to buy QSR Brands Bhd, the parent of KFC. But interestingly, Kulim (M) Bhd (that owns 58% of QSR) has rejected all bids, saying that it is not interested in selling QSR and that it believes in the long-term value of KFC.

The million-dollar question then is this: how did the bids come about if Kulim or in effect, Johor Corp (JCorp), Kulim's parent (and therefore the ultimate shareholder of KFC) is not interested in selling? Rarely do unsolicited bids of this size come about.

This is why the one unique spin-off from this KFC saga is the attention it has drawn on JCorp. Firstly, JCorp is saddled with more than RM6bil in debt, out of which RM3.6bil is due to be repaid by July 2012.
It remains to be seen if JCorp can afford to repay this debt without having to embark on some asset sales.

Secondly, there's the issue of a perceived lack of leadership at JCorp.

Its previous head honcho Tan Sri Muhammad Ali Hashim, who has grown to become synonymous with JCorp, after leading it for more than 28 years, has suddenly left his position.

The reasons for his departure he left on short notice and months before his actual retirement date remains a mystery. Word on the street is that more powerful personalities in Johor are not agreeable to Muhammad Ali being at the helm of JCorp.

Muhammad Ali could not be reached for this article. Neither did JCorp respond to questions from StarBizWeek.

But insiders reckon that both JCorp's debt and Muhammad Ali's departure have a lot to do with the two bids for QSR.

QSR for sale?
QSR was put up for sale, there's no doubt about that, points out an investment banker. But by whom?

Insiders say it could be Muhammad Ali. He remains chairman of Kulim, QSR and KFC although rumours are that he will not be for long, following his departure from JCorp.

Still, Muhammad Ali has been the one who got KFC into JCorp.

Those following KFC's colourful history will recall that Kulim's entry into KFC came about at the apex of an all-out battle between a management buy-out team led by Datuk Johari Abdul Ghani and another faction led by Tan Sri Nik Ibrahim Kamil, who was believed to be aligned to businessman Datuk Soh Chee Wen.
Johari, meanwhile, was said to have been backed by Datuk Ishak Ismail, a controversial character and is said to have been the person controlling KFC for many years, despite not appearing on its board.

Interestingly, Ishak is still rumoured to be playing a part in the current QSR/KFC saga, but it is unclear how.
At the height of the battle between these two factions, Kulim, under Muhammad Ali's stewardship, swooped in and took the prized asset, paying RM3.20 per QSR share.

Another reason KFC is said to be up for sale is because of JCorp's perceived need for money to repay its debt.

Indeed, there are some parties who reckon that JCorp is a distressed company. According to its 2009 annual report, JCorp had RM705mil in cash but a whopping RM6.62bil in debt and with hardly any free cash flows.

It also paid around RM500mil in interest payments and RM1.7bil in loan repayments.

Despite being perceived as asset rich, it only booked a paltry RM5mil in dividend receipts in FY2009.

The huge debt at JCorp is said to be a legacy left by Muhammad Ali, although his admirers would say that he had built the group into an asset-rich one, with more than 200 companies in its stable and easily the state investment arm with the largest spread of businesses in the country.

Muhammad Ali has denied allegations that his resignation was due to the debt woes of JCorp. He has repeatedly quoted these figures that JCorp's asset value today is in excess of RM12bil, out of which RM6bil is in listed shares of companies. All of these is worth much more than JCorp's debt, he was reported to have said.

JCorp will not face bankruptcy. The debt due is on July 31, 2012 and we will negotiate with the bank to refinance. Debt is normal in business, he has been quoted as saying.
JCorp's structural problem
Another problem with JCorp is the structure of the ownership of its assets. It doesn't own most of its prized assets directly. Two of its prized assets are KFC and the London-listed New Britain Palm Oil Ltd (NBPO).

JCorp owns 53% of Kulim, which owns 50% of NBPO and 57.5% of QSR. QSR then owns 50.6% of KFC. So if these assets were to be sold, the sale proceeds would be trapped at Kulim. What that means is that if the money Kulim got from the sale of NBPO or QSR were to be paid out in dividends, JCorp would only get half that, with Kulim's other shareholders enjoying the proceeds as well. No wonder then that Kulim's share price has enjoyed a stellar performance, almost doubling from early this year.

Largely due to high crude palm oil prices, Kulim's other key asset, NBPO, the largest oil palm plantation and milling operator in Papua New Guinea, has also experienced a rise in its share price, by over 80% this year. Currently trading at 7.60 per share, Kulim's 50% stake in it is worth some RM2.6bil. Kulim's stake in QSR, which has also seen its share price go up by some 75% year-to-date, has a market value of some RM968mil.

JCorp ideally should have a more flat' structure, whereby it owns the assets directly. It is something that can be done via a group-wide restructuring exercise. But that will be complex and takes time, says a fund manager.

To be fair, the current structure has its merits. JCorp's effective stakes in KFC and NBPO are only 15% and in 26% respectively and yet it controls these assets. That means JCorp per se did not have to fork out too much money to gain control of these entities.
Sale of other assets by JCorp?
In any case, JCorp has other assets that can be sold. One is its direct stake of 48.35% of KPJ Healthcare Bhd.

That stake alone has a market value of RM1bil. KPJ, the leading listed healthcare provider in the country, with 19 hospitals and close to 2,000 beds, has been another venture spearheaded by Muhammad Ali.
The group has been profitable over the past three financial years, with an annual turnover of more than RM1bil a year and y-o-y earnings growth of 15% to 30%. In FY2009, it posted net income of RM110.9mil on the back of RM1.46bil in revenue.

A likely buyer of KPJ could be Khazanah Nasional Bhd, bankers say, which is growing its healthcare business, having just forked out some RM8bil to take over Singapore's Parkway Holdings Ltd.
Other assets that JCorp can sell are plantation and industrial land mainly in Johor that is directly owned by JCorp.

It should also be noted though that some investors have a beef with the companies in JCorp's stable because of a preponderance of related party transactions (RPTs).

For example it has been reported that the Employees Provident Fund (EPF), which had initially supported Kulim's entry into QSR and KFC, had subsequently sold off its shares because it didn't like the series of RPTs that took place in KFC under Kulim.

Enter Halim Saad
Back to the potential takeover of KFC.

One of the recent bidders for KFC is well-known tycoon Tan Sri Halim Saad. After his first bid that worked out to a price of RM5.60 per QSR share (his bid was actually for the assets of QSR), the Carlyle Group made an offer of RM6.70 per QSR share. Halim, teaming up with KUB Bhd and CVC Capital, then raised his bid to match's Carlyle's offer.

While Halim declined comment for this article, parties close to him say that his motivation for making the bid was that KFC could be run more efficiently. This has often been the stated reason for other bidders for KFC in the past.

Carlyle, on the other hand, is said to be keen on KFC because of the latter's recent expansion into India, not to mention its attractive cash flows.

But despite JCorp's rejection of these offers, rumours are rife that a deal involving the sale of QSR is still in the works.

Valuation-wise, the RM6.70 price tag does seem attractive. It values QSR at RM1.9bil or around 17 times FY2010 forecast earnings.

In a recent note, CIMB Research gave its take on the situation. The report said that the main reason for Kulim's decision not to sell is the growth opportunities in India.

To recap, KFC entered India on the invitation of Yum!, the US-based franchiser of KFC. 
Yum! influence
That was a coup for KFC and demonstrates its warm ties with Yum! CIMB Research said. The report also highlighted the fact that KFC's three outlets in India are reporting monthly sales averaging RM450,000 per outlet, compared with RM250,000 per-Malaysian KFC outlet. This may increase KFC India's chances of taking over five profitable outlets which are now under Yum!, CIMB Research said.

Some insiders reckon the rejection of Idaman Saga was influenced by Yum!. This is because KUB (which was part of the second Idaman Saga bid) holds the Yum! franchise for A&W in Malaysia and Thailand.

Unlike KFC, KUB's food business, which is represented by the A&W franchise, has been far from roaring, turning in a net loss of RM3.6mil in the first half of 2010, said an insider.

But there is less explanation as to why Carlyle was rejected. Carlyle has a thriving list of food and beverage investments including Dunkin' Donuts, Baskin Robbins, Dr Pepper and 7-Up.

Perhaps there are some other considerations going on, to the effect not just any party can come to own a company like KFC, considering its vast reach into Malaysia, suggests an industry player.

In all likelihood though, this KFC saga is far from over. But the bigger story to watch though is how will JCorp fix its debt issue.

 http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2010/12/4/business/7554792&sec=business

Read more...

Branson: KL a good investment destination

>> Thursday, September 30, 2010

This is an article i read from btimes, about the comment from Sir Richard Branson. I have also highlight the important point of this article.

All in all, for Malaysia to attract more interested from foreign company or fund, we need to be more liberal and transparent. Below are the story:


Malaysia is an attractive investment destination but some issues need to be tackled to attract investors, said Virgin Group founder Sir Richard Branson.

"I think Malaysia has a good reputation but some issues like what's happening with your ex-deputy prime minister (Datuk Seri) Anwar (Ibrahim) has damaged the country's reputation among foreign investors. This thing has gone on for some time," he said.

The British billionaire was speaking at the two-day "Dawn of the New Decade: Alternative Investments in Asia" forum, organised by the International Herald Tribune in Kuala Lumpur yesterday.

He was responding to questions on whether Malaysia's current economic and investment policies would be sustainable for future growth and if the political climate could affect investments.

Branson also said that Malaysia should be more liberal and open in its approach to win new investments.

"Malaysia has got a tremendous future. Generally speaking, I think Malaysia has a lot to teach the West. We look forward to learning a lot from you," he said.

The New Economic Model is seeking US$444 billion of investments over the next decade to lift the country to developed nation status.

Branson, whose Virgin Group has a stake in AirAsia's long-haul affiliate AirAsia X, also said Malaysia should split up and privatise large government-owned companies, which account for more than a third of the stock market value to increase competition and woo foreign investors.

"A lot of your companies are run by the government. It will be better if you privatise, break up big ones into smaller firms for them to compete with each other," he said.

Meanwhile, the Malaysian Investment Development Authority chairman, Tan Sri Dr Sulaiman Mahbob said there is a need to liberalise the services sector to attract foreign investments into the country.

Read more: Branson: KL a good investment destination http://www.btimes.com.my/Current_News/BTIMES/articles/jalibo/Article/#ixzz10wx8IzyP

Read more...

  © Blogger template Simple n' Sweet by Ourblogtemplates.com 2009

Back to TOP